Enter your keyword, ad details and landing page URL. Click Estimate to get your score, component breakdown and improvement roadmap.
Enter your keyword, ad copy and landing page URL, then click Estimate Quality Score.
Type the exact keyword you're bidding on. Quality Score is always keyword-level, Google evaluates how well your ad and landing page match that specific search query.
Paste your ad headline and description. The tool checks whether your target keyword appears in both, a critical factor in Ad Relevance, which accounts for around a third of your QS.
Enter the URL of the page you're sending traffic to. The tool checks URL structure, keyword match signals and common landing page quality factors like load speed and content alignment.
Your estimated Quality Score is shown out of 10, with a breakdown of all three components and a prioritised list of specific improvements, ordered by impact on your QS and CPC.
Quality Score is Google's 1 to 10 rating of how relevant your keyword, ad and landing page are to each other and to the searcher. A higher score lowers what you pay per click and improves where your ad shows, so it is one of the few levers that makes advertising cheaper rather than just bigger.
Three things build it. Expected click-through rate carries the most weight and is largely historical. Ad relevance asks whether your ad actually mentions what was searched for. Landing page experience asks whether the page delivers what the ad promised, quickly and on a phone.
The number in your account is diagnostic, not a target. Google has said Quality Score is not used directly in the auction. It reports on inputs the auction already considers. Chasing the digit itself misses the point.
Quality Score updates as your keyword gathers impressions and clicks, not the moment you make a change. A busy keyword can reflect a real fix within days, while a low-volume one takes weeks. A dash where the number should be is a null score, which means the keyword has too little traffic yet for Google to rate it, common on new or niche keywords. Keep the traffic flowing and it fills in. This visible 1 to 10 score is a Search-campaign metric. Display campaigns use a separate quality model that Google does not surface in the same way, so the number here is about your Search keywords.
Written by Chirag Arora, digital marketing consultant with 17+ years of hands-on SEO experience across 500+ projects. He designed this tool and the other 22 free tools on this site. Verify on LinkedIn.
| Component | How fast can you fix it? | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Ad relevance | Today | Put the exact keyword in the headline. If a group covers twelve loosely related terms, split it. This is the fastest win in paid search |
| Landing page experience | A week or two | Send the click to a page about that keyword, not your homepage. Make it load fast on a phone and deliver what the ad promised |
| Expected CTR | Slowly, and partly never | Largely historical, so a new keyword starts on an industry average. Better ads improve it over time. There is no shortcut |
| The score itself | Do not | It is a symptom. Fixing the score is not a task. Fixing relevance and the landing page is, and the score follows |
The expected CTR row is where people waste months. It is the heaviest component and the least controllable, because it leans on historical performance you cannot rewrite. A brand new keyword inherits an average and has to earn its way up. Meanwhile ad relevance can be fixed this afternoon by writing the keyword into the headline, and it is the commonest gap I find, usually caused by ad groups stuffed with twenty vaguely related keywords sharing one generic ad. Split the group, write a specific ad and watch the score move. Google's own Quality Score documentation describes it as a diagnostic rather than a KPI.
This free Quality Score estimator takes your keyword, your ad and your landing page and tells you where the relevance gaps probably are. It scores the three components Google uses, then gives you a roadmap ordered by what you can actually change. It runs online with no account and nothing to install.
Being clear about what this is, an estimate. Your real Quality Score lives in your Google Ads account and only Google can compute it, because it depends on historical performance data that does not exist outside your account. What this does is check the parts anyone can inspect from the outside, mainly whether your ad says what was searched for and whether your landing page delivers it. That is where the fixable problems are anyway.
Across 500+ projects the pattern is consistent. Almost nobody has a Quality Score problem. They have an ad group problem, twenty loosely related keywords sharing one generic ad, so no searcher ever sees their own words reflected back. Split the group and write the keyword into the headline. The score follows without anyone optimising it. Check the landing page speed with the free website speed test, draft better ads with the free ad copy generator, and browse the rest of the free SEO tools.
Treat each component as a repair list, not a grade. Google marks expected CTR, ad relevance and landing page experience as Above average, Average or Below average, and the Below-average ones tell you exactly where the fix belongs, weak CTR is usually a headline problem, weak relevance a message-match problem, weak landing page a page problem. One 2026 change matters here, Core Web Vitals now feed the landing page experience component directly, so a slow page with a poor Largest Contentful Paint drags the score even when the copy is perfect. Sort your keywords by spend and fix the expensive Below-average ones first, because a keyword that reaches a 10 can cost a large fraction less per click than an average one.
Straight about the method. This cannot see your real Quality Score and nothing outside your Ads account can. Google calculates it from historical click data specific to your keywords, and there is no API that exposes it to a third party tool. What this checks is the observable half, whether your keyword appears in your ad, whether your landing page is about that keyword, then whether the promise in the ad matches the page. Those map onto ad relevance and landing page experience, two of the three components. Expected click-through rate is historical and unknowable from here, so it is estimated from the other signals rather than measured. The weights are my judgement from 500+ campaigns, not a Google formula. Use this to find the gaps, then read the real number in your account, where the Quality Score column is one click away.
Common questions about this free tool, answered clearly.
No. Your real score lives in your Google Ads account and only Google can calculate it, because it depends on historical click data specific to your keywords that no external tool can access. This estimates the observable parts, whether your ad mentions what was searched, then whether your landing page delivers it. To see the actual number, open the Keywords tab in Google Ads, then click Columns and add Quality Score. It is free and it is one click away.
Put the exact keyword in your ad headline. That single change fixes ad relevance, the one component you can improve today. It is also the commonest gap by far. The usual cause is an ad group holding twenty loosely related keywords sharing one generic ad, so nobody ever sees their own search reflected back. Split the group so each ad matches a tight set of keywords. Everything else is slower.
Yes, that is the point of it. A higher score lowers your cost per click and improves your position for the same bid, so it is one of the few levers that makes advertising cheaper instead of just louder. A keyword at 3 can cost several times more per click than the same keyword at 8. That is why relevance work usually beats bid work.
Often because expected click-through rate is historical and lags reality. A keyword that recently improved carries the weight of its past. It is also relative. Your score compares you to other advertisers on the same keyword, so a strong ad in a fiercely competitive auction can still score middling. If conversions are healthy and the cost is acceptable, a mediocre score is not an emergency.
Not directly, and Google has said so. Quality Score is a diagnostic that reports on the same signals the auction already considers through Ad Rank. It is a dashboard reading rather than a dial. That is why chasing the digit is the wrong instinct. Fix relevance and the landing page, and the number moves as a consequence rather than a goal.
7 or above is comfortable, 8 to 10 is strong. Below 5 means something is clearly mismatched. But context matters. A broad head term in a competitive auction may sit at 6 for reasons outside your control, while a tightly matched long tail keyword should be at 9 without effort. Look at your worst performers rather than your average, because the average hides the ones costing you money.
This free tool finds the gaps. If you would rather someone closed them, here are a few honest reasons businesses hire me as their SEO and digital marketing consultant in India.
Almost every low Quality Score I inherit is one ad group holding twenty unrelated keywords and one generic ad. Splitting it is unglamorous and it is usually the whole fix.
I started as a technical SEO trainee, not in a management seat, and I still build the campaigns myself. You get direct expertise, not an account handed to a junior.
The Quality Score estimator you just used, I designed it, along with 22 other free SEO tools on this site. It is a direct look at how I audit an account before you ever become a client.
Relevance work lowers cost per click. Bidding harder just spends more. I would rather make your existing budget go further than ask you for another one.
Messages get a reply within 24 hours on business days, and WhatsApp is the fastest way to reach me for anything urgent. You are not waiting in a support queue.
Half of paid search problems are not in the account at all. They are a slow page that does not say what the ad promised, and no bid strategy fixes that.
"One ad group held 30 keywords and one generic ad. Chirag split it into eight tight groups and rewrote the ads. Cost per click dropped by a third on the same budget."
"We were bidding harder every month to hold position. He fixed relevance instead and we paid less for better placement. His 17+ years of experience really shows."
"As a small business, we started with Chirag's free tools, then hired him. Ranked Page 1 for our main terms within 3 months. Practical, no fluff, real value."
Featured on leading media platforms. Watch interviews, expert commentary and digital marketing insights covered by top news channels and podcasts.
CMD Club Meet 2025 at Club Capri, Gurgaon : A Brief of ClipsTrust
YouTube · Business Meet
How to Build Customer 🔥Trust 🔥 - Biggest Challenges Today
Eventra vlogs
Digital Marketing Beginner to Advanced Journey | Podcast b/w Chirag Arora & Pankaj
YouTube · Podcast Episode